Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 20
MINIMUM
WAGE
A RISK FOR
RESTAURANTS?
With the enactment of the Fair Shot Minimum Wage
Amendment Act, Washington, D.C., joined New York
and California in mandating pay increases for minimumwage workers. And, like California, the restaurant industry
in the District of Columbia is largely affected by the
wage increases.
A study released in March by the University of California,
Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education
showed that 15 percent of all California workers who
will benefit from the state's minimum wage increase -
to $15 by 2018 - are employed within the restaurant
and food service industry. Retail workers and restaurant
employees in the state are the top two low-wage earners
who will be affected by the increase, the study said.
The Restaurant Association of Metropolitan Washington
(RAMW) represents numerous restaurants throughout
the District, serving as "advocate, resource and
community for its members." Its political action
committee's stated goal is to "promote the interests
of the food service industry through . . . the support
or defeat of legislative or regulatory issues that impact
our industry."
Andrew J. Kline, who serves as legislative counsel for the
RAMW, says the association supports the District's $5 per
hour tipped wage increase, calling it a "reasonable result"
in comparison to the initial proposal of $7.50.
"The increase, because it was moderated, will have less
of an impact on the industry as a whole," says Kline.
However, Kline says, some establishments may still
struggle with the changes. "The overall higher minimum
wage, along with the higher tipped wage, will have
some effect, particularly for smaller restaurants."
Michael Hassen, a partner at the California-based firm
Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP, represents numerous
restaurant owners in the state. He agrees with Kline's
assertion that smaller restaurants will feel most of the
impact of the wage increases, unlike higher-end
establishments that are able to pass on the added costs
to their customers.
"People expect to pay more at these restaurants, so an
additional $10 to $20 won't matter," Hassen says.
20 WASHINGTON LAWYER * SEPTEMBER 2016 *
Mid-level restaurants, he says, do not have the same
luxury due to high levels of competition. "A change of
$10 to $20 is significant for diners. Instead, we may see
managers firing staff and taking on more of the
lower-level duties," he explains.
"People in these positions would expect to be paid
better than the person who is behind the scenes,
washing dishes or bussing tables. How do you adjust
the salaries for positions that are of greater importance
to the restaurant?" Hasen asks.
Hassen says there are two categories of lower-level
restaurants: small seated eateries and mom-and-pop
takeout shops. While takeout shops are less likely to be
affected due to smaller staffing needs, seated
establishments may experience financial challenges.
"At the low end, it becomes a question of whether
or not to stay in business," Hassen says.
For some establishments, the answer may lie in
prohibiting tips altogether. Instead, customers will pay
a standard service charge. But this could prove
counterproductive, taking away hard-earned tips
from exceptional servers.
According to Hassen, the culture of the restaurant
business creates a perspective that many lawmakers
miss. "People tend to think of minimum wage as what
someone needs to support a family, and they address
the issue in a way that ignores the impact [that raising
the minimum wage has] on other people," he says.
"Restaurants do not want to take advantage of people,
but they have created positions that are not meant for
heads of households," referring to dishwasher and
busboy positions often filled by teenagers and young
workers with no experience.
However, the Economic Policy Institute report shows
that only 2.5 percent of workers in Washington, D.C.,
who would benefit from a higher minimum wage are
teenagers. The vast majority are adults of modest means
who are working to support their households. Most of
them bring in half of their family's income and roughly 20
percent of them are the sole providers for their families.
For Peter Edelman, the Carmack Waterhouse Professor
of Law and Public Policy at Georgetown University Law
Center, the minimum wage increase is "a good thing,"
citing the rising costs of living in the District where rents
are steadily increasing.
"Large numbers of people working at the minimum
wage rate are spending a huge amount of their income
on rent. A higher wage is necessary in our city and what
we must do," says Edelman, who chairs the D.C. Access
to Justice Commission.
While Hassen says he is in favor of a living wage, he
points out that chefs, servers, and bartenders serve in
different capacities than busboys and dishwashers.
The former are more essential to the dining experience
and success of the restaurant, he says.
Clearly, there is no single predictor for the impact
of a minimum wage increase on restaurant owners.
"It really isn't something you can look at across the
board," says Hassen. "Some restaurants are going to
weather it better than others."
FOCUSING ON
IMMIGRANT WORKERS
The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that immigrant
workers make up about 10 percent of the restaurant
industry's total workforce. While a majority of these
individuals work within the parameters of the law,
federal crackdowns have exposed significant problems
with unauthorized employment.
The Pew Hispanic Center estimates that unauthorized
workers, mostly employed as food preparers and servers,
comprise about 11 percent of the restaurant industry's
labor force. Not surprisingly, discussions about raising the
minimum wage often include assertions that doing so
would increase the employment of undocumented
workers paid in cash.
Allen Orr, who has over 13 years of experience in U.S.
and global immigration practice, is among those who
think that an increase in minimum wage may attract
more undocumented people to these positions.
"Employers may try to bring in undocumented workers
and pay them under the table at a rate less than
minimum wage," Orr says.
But Orr doesn't expect this to be a real issue. "It may
occur in some of the mom-and-pop shops, but these
are establishments that would have hired these
workers anyway. It is highly unlikely that it will become
a widespread issue with E-Verify in place," he says.
http://www.dcbar.org/
Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Washington Lawyer - September 2016
Contents
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - Cover1
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - Cover2
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 1
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - Contents
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 3
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 4
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 5
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 6
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 7
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 8
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 9
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 10
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 11
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 12
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 13
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 14
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 15
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 16
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 17
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 18
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 19
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 20
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 21
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 22
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 23
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 24
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 25
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 26
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 27
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 28
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 29
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 30
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 31
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 32
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 33
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 34
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 35
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 36
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 37
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 38
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 39
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 40
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 41
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 42
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 43
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 44
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 45
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 46
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 47
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 48
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - 49
Washington Lawyer - September 2016 - Cover4
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/novemberdecember2024
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/septemberoctober2024
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/julyaugust2024
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/mayjune2024
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/marchapril2024
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/januaryfebruary2024
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/novemberdecember2022
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/novemberdecember2022
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/novemberdecember2022
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/novemberdecember2022
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/novemberdecember2022
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/novemberdecember2022
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/novemberdecember2022
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/januaryfebruary2022
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/januaryfebruary2022
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/januaryfebruary2022
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/januaryfebruary2022
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/januaryfebruary2022
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/novemberdecember2021
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/julyaugust2021
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/julyaugust2021
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/marchapril2021
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/marchapril2021
http://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/novemberdecember2020
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/novemberdecember2020
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/septemberoctober2020
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/julyaugust2020
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/june2020
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/may2020
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/march2020
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/january2020
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/november2019
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/october2019
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/september2019
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/julyaugust2019
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/june2019
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/may2019
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/april2019
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/march2019
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/january2019
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/november2018
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/november2018
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/november2018
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/august2018
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/august2018
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/June/July2018
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/april2018
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/March2018
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/February2018
https://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/january2018
http://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/december2017
http://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/November2017
http://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/september 2017
http://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/september 2017
http://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/august2017
http://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/july2017
http://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/June2017
http://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/may2017
http://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/april2017
http://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/march2017
http://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/february2017
http://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/january2017
http://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/december2016
http://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/november2016/
http://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/october2016
http://washingtonlawyer.dcbar.org/september2016
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com